The automation of a high-hazard job to reduce employee injuries is an example of which type of hazard control?

The automation of a high-hazard job to reduce employee injuries exemplifies engineering control measures. Engineering controls involve modifying the physical environment or work processes to eliminate or significantly reduce exposure to hazards. By automating a job that poses significant risks to employee safety, the organization is substituting a potentially dangerous task with machinery or technology, which minimizes the chance of human injury. This form of hazard control is proactive, focusing on removing the hazard rather than simply managing it through processes or training.

Administrative controls, on the other hand, involve changes to work policies or procedures that can affect safety, such as scheduling practices or job rotation. Training is focused on educating staff on safety practices and hazard recognition but does not inherently remove the physical hazard. Personal protective equipment (PPE) serves as the last line of defense when hazards cannot be adequately controlled by other means, but it does not eliminate the hazard itself. Therefore, engineering controls such as automation are considered more effective in high-hazard scenarios.